Metrics and ratings reference

This article provides definitions for the metrics and ratings used by Code Quality.

You can see the rule-based results for your repository on your Security tab, in the 표준 결과 tab under " 코드 품질".

Metric definitions

The following table provides definitions for each metric that is reported for your repository.

Metric	Definition	Example findings
Reliability	Assess whether the code performs its intended function correctly, predictably, and consistently. Reliable code is free from bugs, handles errors safely, and operates as expected under normal and edge-case conditions.	Issues with performance, concurrency, error handling, correctness, API design, accessibility, internationalization, or security
Maintainability	Assess how easy it is to understand, modify, and extend the code over time. Maintainable code follows best practices, avoids unnecessary complexity, and is organized for ease of future changes and collaboration.	Not using best practices, unused/dead code, duplicate code, complexity, logical redundancies, inadequate documentation, dependency issues

Severity levels

Severity levels are used to indicate the potential impact or urgency of a code quality finding. They help users prioritize remediation efforts and communicate risks to stakeholders. Severity is determined by the rule that detected the issue, following conventions from CodeQL and industry standards.

Severity	Definition
Error	Indicates a high-severity issue that is likely to cause bugs, failures, or major maintainability risks.
Warning	Indicates a moderate-severity issue that may impact code quality or reliability, but is not immediately critical.
Note	Indicates a low-severity issue, minor improvement, or recommendation. These findings are useful for ongoing code health and maintainability.

Ratings definitions

These ratings are used to summarize the overall reliability and maintainability of a repository based on the severity of rule-based results found by CodeQL scans of the full default branch:

Rating	Definition	Criteria (based on findings)
Excellent	Codebase demonstrates best practices for reliability and maintainability.	No code quality findings detected
Good	Codebase has low-severity issues or minor improvements are suggested.	≥1 "Note" level finding
Fair	Codebase has moderate-severity issues that may impact quality, but are not critical.	≥1 "Warning" level finding
Needs Improvement	Codebase has high-severity issues, including bugs or major maintainability risks.	≥1 "Error" level finding

Further reading

• GitHub 코드 품질 정보
• 리포지토리에 대한 코드 품질 결과 해석